This website stores cookies on your computer. We use this information to improve and customize your browsing experience and for analytics and metrics about our visitors.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Getting skeptics on board with change is very, very hard. Not impossible, but hard.
If someone’s skeptical, it’s probably for one of two reasons:
Your goal as a leader of change should be to prevent people from being in group 1 by getting input beforehand and making them feel they were part of the decision. Group 1 folks need time, and to be genuinely listened to, and engaged respectfully with information and patience. They will then either become supporters or move into Group 2.
Group 2 folks are a different story, and it very much depends on whether they’re in group 2a (don’t agree with the why) or group 2b (don’t agree with the how).
2a people don’t believe things should change. You either haven’t made your case compellingly enough, and need to help them understand what’s at stake, or they have a different vision for the future than you do.
At some point, they need to choose whether they’re on board or not. You need to decide what you expect from them. People who don’t agree with the “why” but have a supportive, trusting attitude can eventually come around. But sometimes these people can be toxic, spreading their dissatisfaction and skepticism.
Give direct feedback, make your expectations clear, and then be prepared to follow through if they’re not willing to get on board.
Group 2b might be called your “willing skeptics.” They agree change is needed but might have different ideas about what needs to change, or when, or how it should happen. Ideally, you’d get their input before the process starts. But the answer here is the same: ask for their trust, and reassure them that if what you’re doing won’t work, you’ll do something different for the good of the company—and you will always remain receptive to their ideas.
See if you can find anything at all to validate their concerns and ideas. If not, it’s the same playbook: listen well, make your expectations clear, and follow through.
This is all messier in practice than it looks written out. Most of this can be avoided by genuinely involving people in change before it starts.
Overcoming skepticism towards change demands empathy, clear communication, and a proactive approach to addressing concerns. By engaging both individuals unaware of the change and those questioning its rationale or execution, leaders can foster understanding, build trust, and steer the organization towards successful adaptation and growth.
Contact us today to learn more.